ailettergen · Starter
$10 / 30 days · planned
Letter and email drafting. Starter maximum: 30 standard OR 8 premium letters OR 5 university researches from a shared allowance. Paid plans are being prepared.
هذه الصفحة متاحة بالإنجليزية والروسية.
Compare the price—and the work you need to do.
Our planned Starter price is $10 for 30 days, below the listed Rezi Pro and Teal+ 30-day prices. These products offer different tools and usage limits, so price alone does not tell the whole story.
Rezi Pro
$29 / month
A resume and job-application suite, including cover letters, resume tools and a monthly expert resume review.
Teal+
$29 / 30 days
A resume and job-search workspace, including job tracking, resume analysis and AI cover letters.
| Product / plan | Listed price (USD) | What you are choosing |
|---|---|---|
| ailettergen · Starter | $10 / 30 days · planned | Letter and email drafting. Starter maximum: 30 standard OR 8 premium letters OR 5 university researches from a shared allowance. Paid plans are being prepared. |
| Rezi Pro | $29 / month | A resume and job-application suite, including cover letters, resume tools and a monthly expert resume review. |
| Teal+ | $29 / 30 days | A resume and job-search workspace, including job tracking, resume analysis and AI cover letters. |
Official sources checked October 12, 2026. Published USD prices; taxes, currency conversion and promotions may differ. Competitor prices can change.
Rezi and Teal also offer free options. Longer billing periods or promotions can reduce their effective price. Our Plus ($20) and Pro ($28) are also below these specific $29 plans, but we do not claim to be the cheapest tool or to offer equivalent unlimited usage.
Which approach fits your application?
Choose a focused writing workspace if your main task is drafting and refining a letter or email. Consider a broader career suite if you also need a resume builder, application tracking or expert resume reviews. Compare the features you will actually use, not just the headline price.
A writing workspace for your next opportunity.This detailed guide is currently available in English.
Practical reference
Compare writing services by cost, scope and workflow
A useful comparison considers more than one number. The selected published prices above have source links and a research date. This guide explains how to compare billing periods, document tools, limits and the kind of work each service is meant to help you finish.
Compare prices on the same basis
A fair subscription comparison starts with the billing period and what each product includes. A monthly plan, a 30-day pass and an annual subscription shown as a monthly equivalent are different commitments. A resume builder with job tracking and resume analysis also has a different scope from a focused letter writing service. Compare the advertised cost, the upfront payment, the available functions and the limits that matter to your own workflow. A lower sticker price is useful information, but it does not establish that two products are identical.
Our comparison identifies selected published plans and links to their providers so you can check current terms. The pricing research recorded Rezi Pro at $29 per month and Teal+ at $29 for 30 days. Our planned $10, $20 and $28 packages are lower than those particular listed options, with different usage limits and product scope. Free plans, discounted annual billing and promotions can change the decision. Do not read this as a claim that AI Letter Generator is cheaper than every service or has equivalent unlimited access. Review the comparison date and check the provider before purchasing.
Read compare →Evaluate value beyond the subscription number
Value depends on what you need to finish. If you mainly need a cover letter and a professional email, a focused workspace may be easier to use than a broad career platform. If you need a resume builder, job application tracker, resume scoring or a full template library, a broader product may be worth its higher price. List your essential tasks before comparing subscriptions. Then test how each product handles your actual information, rather than relying only on an attractive sample written for an imaginary applicant.
Look at editing, exports, language handling, source checking and the ability to reuse your background. Inspect what happens when an AI response is inaccurate or a generation fails. Ask whether the package limits are separate allowances or alternative maximums from one pool. Consider the time you spend preparing and reviewing a draft as well as the purchase cost. No product can remove the need for accurate personal information and a final review. A useful comparison helps you choose a workflow that suits your needs, rather than telling you that one price alone settles every question.
Read features →Understand the shared plan allowance
The planned Starter package costs $10 for a 30-day period and allows up to 30 standard letters, 8 premium letters or 5 university research requests. Plus costs $20 and allows up to 70 standard letters, 18 premium letters or 10 research requests. Pro costs $28 and allows up to 100 standard letters, 28 premium letters or 15 research requests. These are alternative maximums from one shared allowance. They are not three separate quantities that can all be used in full during the same period.
Mixed usage reduces the remaining allowance according to the operation you choose. A research request and a standard letter do not consume the same share. The account view shows the remaining practical maximums so you can decide whether another operation fits your available usage. The displayed quantities describe writing usage and are not a cash balance that can be withdrawn. Pro’s published limits are the final agreed limits; another 10 percent is not added again. Paid checkout remains unavailable until the paid generation flow is ready and verified. Read the current pricing page for the actual launch state.
Read pricing →When Starter could fit your workflow
Starter is the smallest planned paid package. It may fit someone preparing a limited number of applications or testing a more focused writing routine. Its listed 30 standard letters are the maximum for standard-only usage, while the 8 premium letters and 5 research requests are alternative maximums. If you expect to mix different operations, plan around the shared allowance instead of adding all three numbers together. Consider how many distinct applications you have and how much information is ready before choosing any package.
A person applying to a few well-matched roles may benefit more from careful preparation than from a large generation quota. Draft one application, review the evidence and refine the instructions before repeating the process. Editing an existing saved draft is different from requesting another AI generation. The planned price is $10 for a 30-day prepaid period, not an advertised annual price divided into twelve instalments. Check the checkout and renewal terms when the paid service launches. Until then, the published package describes the proposed offering rather than a promise that every paid operation is already available.
Read pricing →When Plus could fit a larger application list
Plus is the middle planned package at $20 for a 30-day period. The published maximums are 70 standard letters, 18 premium letters or 10 university research requests from a shared allowance. It may suit someone preparing more applications or a mixture of job and university writing. The decision should depend on the work you actually expect to complete during the access period. A larger package is not automatically better if your application details are incomplete or you only need a handful of final documents.
Map your expected usage before choosing: how many opportunities, how many first drafts and how many research questions require a fresh AI request? Keep editing separate from generation in that estimate. Saved documents can be revised directly without treating each keystroke as another generated letter. If a plan is later renewed or changed, inspect the current account dates and remaining usage rather than assuming a previous balance carries over under every circumstance. The pricing comparison explains the published package boundaries; the account shows your own recorded entitlement once purchases are enabled.
Read pricing →Use the Pro maximums accurately
Pro is the largest agreed package at $28 for a 30-day period, with maximums of 100 standard letters, 28 premium letters or 15 university research requests. Those published numbers already reflect the final plan decision. Do not expect an additional 10 percent to be added on top of them. As with Starter and Plus, the allowance is shared across operation types. A mixed month may produce fewer standard letters than the standard-only maximum because premium writing or research uses part of the same allowance.
Pro may be appropriate for frequent writing or a larger programme shortlist, but volume should not replace judgement. Recheck programme facts before sending multiple applications and keep employer-specific drafts clearly titled. A high limit is not a guarantee of better writing, interviews or admission. Premium and standard generation will need clearly described delivery behaviour when the paid backend launches; a label alone should not be used as evidence of a particular model or result. Choose a package for its verified capabilities and useful volume, then evaluate the final document on its content.
Read pricing →Separate free use from planned paid access
The current writing workspace and the planned paid packages must be described separately. An available editor, browser-local session or existing generation route does not mean that a new paid model tier is already operating. The pricing interface keeps checkout unavailable while the paid entitlement and generation delivery are being prepared. This avoids selling a package merely because the plan cards and payment provider integration exist. Look for the actual availability message in the pricing interface before making assumptions about purchasing access.
When comparing with another service, check its free tier separately from its paid plan. Free access may include different exports, generation counts or document types. A trial can also differ from an ongoing free option. Our comparison does not imply that users must buy a subscription somewhere else to draft a letter. If your immediate need is small, try the available workflow and inspect the result before deciding whether a paid package would provide practical value. Product descriptions should identify what you can use today and what is planned, rather than blur those states together.
Read pricing →A focused workflow from context to final draft
The product is organised around a simple sequence: prepare your background, add the opportunity, choose writing preferences and review the draft. This structure keeps the important decisions visible. You can provide a vacancy, an academic programme or a professional email purpose, depending on what you are trying to write. The guides explain how to create a brief for each situation, and the features page describes the actual tools available in the workspace. Internal links connect those explanations to the editor so you can move from reading to writing.
The account adds continuity across devices through an private chat history and reusable profile. Browser-local sessions remain a separate convenience, so you can continue working without automatically uploading every historical draft. Pricing describes planned access levels, while the account reports your own stored payment and usage information. This separation matters: a marketing card should not be treated as a payment receipt, and a saved document should not be treated as proof of an application. The workflow aims to help you prepare a document you understand and can confidently review.
Read features →Review and edit before using a draft
The review step is where an AI response becomes your document. Start by checking the basic facts: name, role, institution, dates, skills and qualifications. Then check the argument: does each paragraph help the reader understand why you are applying? Remove repeated claims, broad praise and sentences that could belong to anyone. Replace them with your own details where those details are relevant. A generated draft is editable in the workspace; you do not have to accept its original wording or order.
The draft review tools show word and character counts and can flag common placeholders. Those checks are practical editing aids, not a guarantee that the document is accurate or suitable. A letter can have the right length and still contain a wrong programme name. It can have no placeholders and still sound generic. Read the text aloud and compare it with the actual application instructions. If possible, ask another person to review the final version. The responsibility for submitting an honest and appropriate application stays with you, even when the first draft was prepared with AI assistance.
Read features →Choose between PDF, text and copied content
Use a text download when you want to continue editing in another application or paste the wording into a form. Use the copy action when the recipient expects text in an email or portal. Use PDF when the application accepts a document attachment and you want a stable visual layout. The available export does not decide what the recipient requires. Check the employer or university instructions before choosing a format, and preview the downloaded file rather than assuming it matches the on-screen appearance perfectly.
For long letters, inspect page breaks and confirm that the closing and signature remain readable. For non-Latin languages, check the characters in the actual PDF and make sure nothing is missing. Keep a sensible filename that identifies the application without exposing unnecessary personal information. Do not upload a file with another employer’s name in it. A downloaded copy is separate from the browser draft and the account copy; later changes to the editor do not automatically change a file you already downloaded. Export again after your final edits and attach the correct version.
Open the writing workspaceChoose the output language deliberately
The interface language and the writing language serve different purposes. You may browse the application in Russian while preparing an English university letter, or use the English interface to draft a French professional email. Choose the output language in the writing settings and inspect the result carefully. Company names, programme titles, qualifications and technical terms may need to remain in their official form. Translating them freely can make the application harder to verify.
Language quality depends on the source information and the generated response. The application does not promise that every sentence is suitable for every regional convention. If the letter is important and you are not confident in the language, ask a fluent reader to review it. Check greetings, levels of formality, punctuation and the meaning of claims about your background. Do not use translation to strengthen a qualification beyond what the original document says. PDF and text exports let you continue reviewing outside the application, but they do not replace a language check. A polished translation should preserve your facts and your intended meaning.
Read features →Check university research against official sources
University information can change between application cycles. Deadlines, tuition, scholarship conditions, document requirements and programme availability should be confirmed on the institution’s own website. An AI research summary is a convenient starting point for organising information, but it is not an official admissions decision. Open the source links, check the academic year and note whether the information applies to your nationality, qualification level and study mode. If a summary has no source for an important claim, treat that claim as unresolved.
Use research notes to record the programme URL, the question you were trying to answer and the information you verified. Keep a distinction between a published fact and your own interpretation. “The page lists a language test requirement” is different from “I meet that requirement.” If two official pages conflict, contact the admissions office rather than asking an AI model to choose one. Saved account notes help you revisit the evidence later, but you must check it again before relying on a deadline or fee. Research access shown in a planned paid package should not be mistaken for an admissions guarantee.
Read features →Recognise useful product evidence
A credible writing product should describe observable features and avoid unsupported success stories. You can inspect whether the editor works, whether the export opens, whether language settings affect the draft and whether a saved document can be reopened. Customer reviews can add another perspective when they come from real users who consented to publication. A decorative five-star rating or an invented user count is not evidence of reliability. Our landing page feedback area displays published, consented reviews when they are available.
The application does not invent testimonials to fill an empty section. The dashboard no longer includes a review submission form. Existing consented reviews remain available for moderation and publication. A useful review can describe a particular writing task, an editing experience or a problem that needs improvement; it should not reveal private applicant information. Product claims should be assessed separately from individual opinions. Someone finding a draft helpful does not demonstrate that every user will receive an interview or that an admissions office will approve the same wording.
Read about →Protect the information you choose to enter
Application writing often contains personal information, but it does not need every detail in your records. Provide what the task requires. A relevant skill, project or qualification may be enough; passport numbers, bank account details, medical records and account passwords do not belong in a letter generation brief. If a resume contains information you do not want an AI provider to process, remove that information before uploading or use a concise text summary instead. Check screenshots for private addresses and unrelated messages.
Account access is managed through Neon Auth, and protected account APIs verify the signed user identity before reading or changing stored writing. The server limits document operations to that identity. These controls reduce accidental cross-account access, but no online service can promise perfect security. Use a password you do not reuse elsewhere and sign out on shared devices. Keep downloaded letters somewhere you control. If you are unsure whether another person’s information may be included, obtain their permission or leave it out. Privacy-conscious preparation also makes a writing brief shorter and clearer.
Read privacy →Understand what the application does not guarantee
AI Letter Generator helps organise information and produce editable writing. It does not verify a qualification with an institution, submit an application to an employer, make an admissions decision or guarantee an interview. It does not turn a word count into a validated ATS score. A university summary can collect information, but the official institution remains the authority for requirements and deadlines. Understanding these boundaries makes it easier to use the service effectively and to recognise when you need advice from a person or a primary source.
The draft review tools provide practical checks such as length and common placeholders. Those tools cannot establish that every statement is true, that a programme accepts AI-assisted writing or that an employer prefers your chosen tone. You should make the final judgement with the actual prompt and your own records in front of you. If a decision depends on legal status, immigration requirements, scholarship eligibility or professional licensing, consult the relevant official authority. Use the application as an aid to drafting and organising questions, while keeping responsibility for the final document and its use.
Read terms →A final checklist before sending
Open the actual application instructions and compare them with the document you intend to send. Confirm the correct recipient, role or programme, the deadline and the requested format. Read the first paragraph without the rest of the letter: does it identify the opportunity and give a specific reason for interest? Read each evidence paragraph separately: can you explain and support its claims? Read the close: is the next step polite, realistic and appropriate? Remove unnecessary repetition and any remaining template placeholders.
Next, inspect the exported file or the text pasted into the destination form. Check formatting, language characters, paragraph breaks and attachments. Make sure you have not selected a version meant for another organisation. Keep a copy for your own records and note the date and destination after submission. A letter generator can reduce the work of starting and revising, but the last check should happen in the actual context where the document will be used. A careful final review protects the value of all the preparation you have already done.
Read guides →