Starter
For a focused shortlist of applications.
$10
USD · per 30 days
- Up to 30 standard letters
- or 8 premium letters
Standard and premium cover letters share one plan allowance; these are alternative maximums.
Les détails des offres sont disponibles en anglais et en russe.
Tarifs
Choose writing support for your job cover letters.
Compare every planCheckout is being prepared. Payments are not available yet.
For a focused shortlist of applications.
$10
USD · per 30 days
Standard and premium cover letters share one plan allowance; these are alternative maximums.
For an active application season.
$20
USD · per 30 days
Standard and premium cover letters share one plan allowance; these are alternative maximums.
For a larger application workload.
$28
USD · per 30 days
Standard and premium cover letters share one plan allowance; these are alternative maximums.
The same writing tools, with an allowance that fits your workload.
Standard and premium cover letters share one plan allowance; these are alternative maximums.
| Features & usage | Starter$10 · per 30 days | Plus$20 · per 30 days | Pro$28 · per 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cover letter allowance | |||
| Standard letters | 30 | 70 | 100 |
| Premium letters | 8 | 18 | 28 |
| Writing tools | |||
| Job application letters | Included | Included | Included |
| Seven interface languages | Included | Included | Included |
| Tone and length controls | Included | Included | Included |
| Manual editing, copy and local export | No usage deducted | No usage deducted | No usage deducted |
Each plan has one shared allowance. Starter covers up to 30 standard letters or 8 premium letters; Plus up to 70 or 18; Pro up to 100 or 28. A mix uses a portion of both limits, rather than adding the maximums together.
Manual changes, copying and local exports do not use your AI allowance. A fresh AI-generated draft or rewrite counts as another generation.
Starter suits a focused shortlist. Plus gives more room for an active search. Pro offers the largest allowance for ongoing applications. All plans include the same writing tools.
This detailed guide is currently available in English.
Practical reference
The agreed planned prices remain Starter $10, Plus $20 and Pro $28. Read the shared allowance carefully and choose for the applications you expect to prepare. The paid packages are being prepared for launch; the available checkout state is shown above.
The planned Starter package costs $10 for a 30-day period and allows up to 30 standard letters, 8 premium letters or 5 university research requests. Plus costs $20 and allows up to 70 standard letters, 18 premium letters or 10 research requests. Pro costs $28 and allows up to 100 standard letters, 28 premium letters or 15 research requests. These are alternative maximums from one shared allowance. They are not three separate quantities that can all be used in full during the same period.
Mixed usage reduces the remaining allowance according to the operation you choose. A research request and a standard letter do not consume the same share. The account view shows the remaining practical maximums so you can decide whether another operation fits your available usage. The displayed quantities describe writing usage and are not a cash balance that can be withdrawn. Pro’s published limits are the final agreed limits; another 10 percent is not added again. Paid checkout remains unavailable until the paid generation flow is ready and verified. Read the current pricing page for the actual launch state.
Read pricing →Starter is the smallest planned paid package. It may fit someone preparing a limited number of applications or testing a more focused writing routine. Its listed 30 standard letters are the maximum for standard-only usage, while the 8 premium letters and 5 research requests are alternative maximums. If you expect to mix different operations, plan around the shared allowance instead of adding all three numbers together. Consider how many distinct applications you have and how much information is ready before choosing any package.
A person applying to a few well-matched roles may benefit more from careful preparation than from a large generation quota. Draft one application, review the evidence and refine the instructions before repeating the process. Editing an existing saved draft is different from requesting another AI generation. The planned price is $10 for a 30-day prepaid period, not an advertised annual price divided into twelve instalments. Check the checkout and renewal terms when the paid service launches. Until then, the published package describes the proposed offering rather than a promise that every paid operation is already available.
Read pricing →Plus is the middle planned package at $20 for a 30-day period. The published maximums are 70 standard letters, 18 premium letters or 10 university research requests from a shared allowance. It may suit someone preparing more applications or a mixture of job and university writing. The decision should depend on the work you actually expect to complete during the access period. A larger package is not automatically better if your application details are incomplete or you only need a handful of final documents.
Map your expected usage before choosing: how many opportunities, how many first drafts and how many research questions require a fresh AI request? Keep editing separate from generation in that estimate. Saved documents can be revised directly without treating each keystroke as another generated letter. If a plan is later renewed or changed, inspect the current account dates and remaining usage rather than assuming a previous balance carries over under every circumstance. The pricing comparison explains the published package boundaries; the account shows your own recorded entitlement once purchases are enabled.
Read pricing →Pro is the largest agreed package at $28 for a 30-day period, with maximums of 100 standard letters, 28 premium letters or 15 university research requests. Those published numbers already reflect the final plan decision. Do not expect an additional 10 percent to be added on top of them. As with Starter and Plus, the allowance is shared across operation types. A mixed month may produce fewer standard letters than the standard-only maximum because premium writing or research uses part of the same allowance.
Pro may be appropriate for frequent writing or a larger programme shortlist, but volume should not replace judgement. Recheck programme facts before sending multiple applications and keep employer-specific drafts clearly titled. A high limit is not a guarantee of better writing, interviews or admission. Premium and standard generation will need clearly described delivery behaviour when the paid backend launches; a label alone should not be used as evidence of a particular model or result. Choose a package for its verified capabilities and useful volume, then evaluate the final document on its content.
Read pricing →A fair subscription comparison starts with the billing period and what each product includes. A monthly plan, a 30-day pass and an annual subscription shown as a monthly equivalent are different commitments. A resume builder with job tracking and resume analysis also has a different scope from a focused letter writing service. Compare the advertised cost, the upfront payment, the available functions and the limits that matter to your own workflow. A lower sticker price is useful information, but it does not establish that two products are identical.
Our comparison identifies selected published plans and links to their providers so you can check current terms. The pricing research recorded Rezi Pro at $29 per month and Teal+ at $29 for 30 days. Our planned $10, $20 and $28 packages are lower than those particular listed options, with different usage limits and product scope. Free plans, discounted annual billing and promotions can change the decision. Do not read this as a claim that AI Letter Generator is cheaper than every service or has equivalent unlimited access. Review the comparison date and check the provider before purchasing.
Read compare →Value depends on what you need to finish. If you mainly need a cover letter and a professional email, a focused workspace may be easier to use than a broad career platform. If you need a resume builder, job application tracker, resume scoring or a full template library, a broader product may be worth its higher price. List your essential tasks before comparing subscriptions. Then test how each product handles your actual information, rather than relying only on an attractive sample written for an imaginary applicant.
Look at editing, exports, language handling, source checking and the ability to reuse your background. Inspect what happens when an AI response is inaccurate or a generation fails. Ask whether the package limits are separate allowances or alternative maximums from one pool. Consider the time you spend preparing and reviewing a draft as well as the purchase cost. No product can remove the need for accurate personal information and a final review. A useful comparison helps you choose a workflow that suits your needs, rather than telling you that one price alone settles every question.
Read features →The current writing workspace and the planned paid packages must be described separately. An available editor, browser-local session or existing generation route does not mean that a new paid model tier is already operating. The pricing interface keeps checkout unavailable while the paid entitlement and generation delivery are being prepared. This avoids selling a package merely because the plan cards and payment provider integration exist. Look for the actual availability message in the pricing interface before making assumptions about purchasing access.
When comparing with another service, check its free tier separately from its paid plan. Free access may include different exports, generation counts or document types. A trial can also differ from an ongoing free option. Our comparison does not imply that users must buy a subscription somewhere else to draft a letter. If your immediate need is small, try the available workflow and inspect the result before deciding whether a paid package would provide practical value. Product descriptions should identify what you can use today and what is planned, rather than blur those states together.
Read pricing →A useful conversation history makes generated drafts easy to identify. Give each item a title that includes the organisation or programme and the purpose, such as “Analyst role — autumn application” or “Masters programme — requirements notes.” The sidebar lists private conversations for cover letters, university applications, professional emails and research. Open a conversation to restore its generated response, rename it to identify the opportunity, or continue it with a new request. Older conversations load in pages of twenty; the result page can load earlier messages. There is no separate manual Saved drafts library or Save to account action.
New generation requests automatically save their brief and response to private chat history. Open a conversation from the sidebar to restore a completed response, or continue it with a new request. Existing browser-local copies are not silently uploaded. Research notes should include the source and what you verified so that they remain understandable weeks later. Delete drafts you no longer need, and download an important final document for your own records. A saved draft is a working document rather than proof that an application was sent, accepted or reviewed by an employer. Use your own submission records to track those events.
Manage your writing accountThe account profile can hold your name, skills, experience, preferred output language and preferred tone. Reusing those details saves repeated typing, especially when you are preparing several applications. Keep the profile factual and current. A useful skills entry describes tools or capabilities you can demonstrate; a useful experience entry gives the setting and your contribution. Avoid putting passwords, identity document numbers, banking information or unrelated confidential material into the profile fields.
A profile is a starting point, not a universal letter. The opportunity still changes from one application to another, and the most relevant example may change with it. Use the profile in the generator, then select the background that fits the current reader. Review stored experience after a course, role or project ends so old information does not accidentally appear as current employment. If you share a device, sign out after using your account and remember that browser-local drafts may remain on that device. Account settings and browser storage serve different functions and should be managed separately.
Manage your writing accountA failed generation can come from a provider issue, an unavailable page, an unreadable upload or incomplete inputs. Keep your source information before retrying. Check whether the error concerns generation, university research, keyword extraction or saving a document, because those operations can fail independently. If the first response is simply vague, improve the brief rather than assuming there was a technical failure. A request that produces poor wording is different from a request that never completes.
If saving fails, keep a local copy of your text and try saving again after checking your connection. A message about an expired session means you need to sign in again before saving to your account. If the problem concerns a paid operation, check the actual account status rather than assuming that a success message on another page describes your current access. Contact support with non-sensitive context if a problem persists. Never send an API key, password or complete payment credential in a support message. Save the text you want to keep before refreshing a working editor.
Manage your writing accountBefore opening an AI cover letter generator, write down the reader, the opportunity and the action you want the reader to take. A useful brief might say: “I am applying for a junior analyst role at a logistics company. I want the hiring team to see how my spreadsheet work and customer support experience match their reporting responsibilities.” This gives the draft a direction. A list of adjectives such as motivated, innovative and passionate gives it much less useful evidence. Keep the actual vacancy open alongside the generator so you can check every important detail.
The writing workspace separates your background from the opportunity and your preferred tone. Use that separation deliberately. Put your real skills and experience in the personal details, the vacancy or programme information in the opportunity fields, and length or style requirements in the custom instructions. If a detail is unknown, ask the model to leave it out. Never ask it to manufacture a qualification or a result. The best starting point is a short, accurate collection of facts that you could comfortably discuss in an interview.
Open the writing workspaceAI Letter Generator helps organise information and produce editable writing. It does not verify a qualification with an institution, submit an application to an employer, make an admissions decision or guarantee an interview. It does not turn a word count into a validated ATS score. A university summary can collect information, but the official institution remains the authority for requirements and deadlines. Understanding these boundaries makes it easier to use the service effectively and to recognise when you need advice from a person or a primary source.
The draft review tools provide practical checks such as length and common placeholders. Those tools cannot establish that every statement is true, that a programme accepts AI-assisted writing or that an employer prefers your chosen tone. You should make the final judgement with the actual prompt and your own records in front of you. If a decision depends on legal status, immigration requirements, scholarship eligibility or professional licensing, consult the relevant official authority. Use the application as an aid to drafting and organising questions, while keeping responsibility for the final document and its use.
Read terms →The review step is where an AI response becomes your document. Start by checking the basic facts: name, role, institution, dates, skills and qualifications. Then check the argument: does each paragraph help the reader understand why you are applying? Remove repeated claims, broad praise and sentences that could belong to anyone. Replace them with your own details where those details are relevant. A generated draft is editable in the workspace; you do not have to accept its original wording or order.
The draft review tools show word and character counts and can flag common placeholders. Those checks are practical editing aids, not a guarantee that the document is accurate or suitable. A letter can have the right length and still contain a wrong programme name. It can have no placeholders and still sound generic. Read the text aloud and compare it with the actual application instructions. If possible, ask another person to review the final version. The responsibility for submitting an honest and appropriate application stays with you, even when the first draft was prepared with AI assistance.
Read features →University information can change between application cycles. Deadlines, tuition, scholarship conditions, document requirements and programme availability should be confirmed on the institution’s own website. An AI research summary is a convenient starting point for organising information, but it is not an official admissions decision. Open the source links, check the academic year and note whether the information applies to your nationality, qualification level and study mode. If a summary has no source for an important claim, treat that claim as unresolved.
Use research notes to record the programme URL, the question you were trying to answer and the information you verified. Keep a distinction between a published fact and your own interpretation. “The page lists a language test requirement” is different from “I meet that requirement.” If two official pages conflict, contact the admissions office rather than asking an AI model to choose one. Saved account notes help you revisit the evidence later, but you must check it again before relying on a deadline or fee. Research access shown in a planned paid package should not be mistaken for an admissions guarantee.
Read features →Open the actual application instructions and compare them with the document you intend to send. Confirm the correct recipient, role or programme, the deadline and the requested format. Read the first paragraph without the rest of the letter: does it identify the opportunity and give a specific reason for interest? Read each evidence paragraph separately: can you explain and support its claims? Read the close: is the next step polite, realistic and appropriate? Remove unnecessary repetition and any remaining template placeholders.
Next, inspect the exported file or the text pasted into the destination form. Check formatting, language characters, paragraph breaks and attachments. Make sure you have not selected a version meant for another organisation. Keep a copy for your own records and note the date and destination after submission. A letter generator can reduce the work of starting and revising, but the last check should happen in the actual context where the document will be used. A careful final review protects the value of all the preparation you have already done.
Read guides →